L · Lift
AI & tooling leverage
57%
↑ +12pp vs last sprint
57% of merged PRs had AI assist — up 12 points in one sprint.
P · Promise
Sprint predictability
87%
→ −2pp vs last sprint
87% of committed stories shipped. Planning accuracy holding steady.
F · Flow
End-to-end cycle time
4d 11h
↑ Review +40% — bottleneck
Review grew to 44 h avg — now 42% of total cycle time.
S · Spark
Developer experience
74/100
→ Flat vs last quarter
Q1 survey: 74/100. Review friction is the top-cited pain point.
Where the work stops
Sprint avg end-to-end cycle time: 4d 11h. Review is the largest stage.
Balance: 5 archetypes, 1 each — no dominance. Single Pathfinder (Yuki) is a bus-factor flag.
Team side quest
🎵 Squad Quest
Blueprint Before Build
The Bridge is holding — but who owns the blueprint? Pair Yuki (Pathfinder) with Priya (Bridge Builder) on the upcoming API refactor. Pathfinders explore; they need landmarks to navigate back to the team. Let Priya provide the structure while Yuki maps the edge cases.
+Collaboration · Builds Cross-team Reach depth · Reduces bus factor
This quest was selected because the team has a single Pathfinder at Verse stage, paired with strong Bridge Builder coverage. The pairing addresses both skill depth and knowledge distribution.
What the data is saying this sprint
🔴Review time doubled since last sprint — 44 h avg, up from 22 h. Review is now the longest stage in cycle time by a wide margin.
🟡AI-assisted PRs grew to 57% of merged work — healthy Lift signal — but AI PRs are disproportionately stuck in the review queue.
🟢Planning accuracy hit 87% — the team is shipping what it commits to. Promise is the strongest pillar this sprint.
Ready to see how this maps to your team's quarterly goals?
See the Tempo Board →
Back to Tempo